Saturday, January 16, 2010

LA Barber Finally Thinks About Retirement - At 94


elvie lewisFor 58 years, Elvie Lewis has faithfully reported to work at his Los Angeles barbershop. The 94 year old has been cutting hair since way before the first man landed on the moon. These days, Lewis doesn't drive, but he still keeps a steady hand as he clips his customers' hair.

"They have fun and talk about the old days and stuff like that," said co-worker Troy Samwel, who has worked alongside Lewis in the shop for six years.

Step inside the South Los Angeles barbershop and you might think you took a trip back in time. There's a well-worn waiting bench, shelves lined with classic hair accoutrement including tonic and scented after-shaves, plus three antique chairs that have more than earned their keep.

So what's changed in his five decades of cutting hair? Well, for starters, the styles. Post-war 50's and the buzz cut was in, followed by the Afro in the 60's, dreadlocks in the 70's, mullets of the 80's, flat tops fades in the 90's and today's clean trims.

And, while the neighborhood outside the shop has evolved, inside has remained largely the same. Longtime customers might notice a difference in the price of a cut, but still a good deal at $15 a head.

"Everybody I know who retires goes out and gets another job. I already have a job," Lewis recently told the Los Angeles Times.

In an age of shrinking 401k's and job insecurity, Lewis is a man who continues to do what he knows best. His customers say they keep coming back for a good cut - but also the positive attitude Lewis has also kept since he set up shop more than 50 years ago.

"All the time he's happy," said Samwel.

While his age and a shrinking customer base has him thinking retirement, Lewis hasn't exactly slowed down in his later years - he still puts in a 7 AM to 5 PM workday five days a week. That's more than the minimum 40 hours many of us consider full time work.

A clean cut for customers, an inspiration to the rest of us of how a smile and an an excellent attitude can transform a shaggy workday into something far better.

"I don't know what's going to happen to him if he stops cutting hair," Samwel explained. "He can't do nothing else!"

Beware of the so-called 401(k) Sucker Punch - Hear what Matthew D. Hutcheson has to say.

By Matthew D. Hutcheson, MS, CPC, AIFA™, CRC®, an independent professional fiduciary and a nationally recognized authority on qualified plans and fiduciary responsibility. He may be contacted at matt@erisa-fiduciary.com.

Unscrambling Fiduciary Confusion

Every now and then "industry experts" write and distribute confusing or misguided information that unintentionally helps professional fiduciaries. Upset and confused plan sponsors turn to professional fiduciaries to "unscramble industry messages."

Plan sponsors want and need to rely on someone who is legally accountable to plan participants. It is confusing and frustrating to plan sponsors to discover the person they hired to help with its 401k plan has no real fiduciary responsibility and hence has no real accountability; accountability that plan sponsors and participants always believe existed!

In seeking clarity about the "type" of 401k professional it has retained, plan sponsors often find the answers they are given to be incoherent with a slant in favor of the 401k industry instead of plan participants. The residual fuzziness plan sponsors are left feeling about this topic is a source of significant irritation to them. Eventually a professional fiduciary will be sought to clarify the confusion, and by so doing, will establish an authentic relationship of trust with the plan sponsor. Professional fiduciaries stand to reap the benefits from the frustration and confusion generated by our well-intentioned colleagues.

Fiduciary Clarity

The various fiduciary roles for qualified retirement plans are spelled out in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). ERISA identifies six general categories of fiduciaries:

1. Named Fiduciary
2. Plan Administrator
3. Trustee
4. Investment Manager
5. Investment Advisor
6. Others that owe a duty of loyalty or act with discretion or authority "to any extent."

1. The Named Fiduciary

A qualified retirement plan, as described in section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRS), is one that meets the definition of a pension benefit or employee benefit plan under ERISA sections 3(2) and 3(3), respectively. Such a plan, most often a 401k plan established for a business, comes into being once plan documents have been drafted and signed.

A responsible party must be named in the plan documents with the duty and the power under ERISA to, in effect, "run" the plan. That party is called the "Named Fiduciary" and it is described in ERISA section 402(a). The Named Fiduciary, which can be an employee of the plan sponsor or even an independent party, has the duty to control, manage and administer the plan, according to ERISA section 402(a)(1). The Named Fiduciary is the primary decision maker in making a qualified retirement plan work; it is the person with ultimate day-to-day responsibility for that.

The Named Fiduciary is always considered a fiduciary within the meaning of ERISA section 3(21). That's why I have referred to such a fiduciary as a "full scope" 3(21) fiduciary (see Sears Roebuck & Co., 2004 N.D. Ill. Mar 3 2004). This is merely one descriptive term for such a fiduciary but other terms that are used such as "full service trustee" or "discretionary trustee" could serve just as well in some instances. (see page 7 of "Evaluation of the Full Service Discretionary Trustee Services Offered by The American National Bank of Texas Wealth Management Group Trust Division," July 2007, by Bruce Ashton and Debra Davis of the law firm of Reish Luftman Reicher and Cohen, now Reish & Reicher). The term "trustee" as used in this context is a misnomer, similar to when it is used to identify a custodian. However, when the terms "full service" or "full spectrum" are used as part of the description, they become an understandable proxy for Named Fiduciary. Whatever the descriptive term one chooses to ascribe to the primary fiduciary decision maker, that role will always "cover the full spectrum of administrative and investment duties of fiduciaries under ERISA." In short, the full scope 3(21) fiduciary is THE Named Fiduciary; put another way, the Named Fiduciary is THE full scope 3(21) fiduciary.

An investment advisor is not, and never will be, the full scope 3(21) fiduciary unless the advisor's name actually appears in plan documents as the Named Fiduciary with authority to hire, monitor, fire and replace service providers and other fiduciaries.

2. The Plan Administrator

The "Plan Administrator" of a qualified retirement plan is defined in section 3(16) of ERISA. The Plan Administrator should not be confused with a "Pension Administrator" or a "Third Party Administrator."

The Plan Administrator has the following primary responsibilities:

  • Ensures all filings with the federal government (form 5500, etc.) are timely made;
  • Makes important disclosures to plan participants;
  • Hires plan service providers if no other fiduciary has that responsibility; and
  • Fulfills other responsibilities as set forth in plan documents.

ERISA sections 101, 102 and 103 describe the specific fiduciary responsibilities and duties of the Plan Administrator. As a practical matter, the plan sponsor will normally reserve these functions of the Plan Administrator for itself. But in some cases, a plan sponsor may appoint an independent fiduciary to serve as the ERISA section 3(16) Plan Administrator. Sometimes a federal court may appoint an independent person to serve as the Plan Administrator of a plan. In any event, the responsibilities and duties of the Plan Administrator are fiduciary in nature.

3. The Trustee

ERISA sections 403(a) and 403(b) describe the duties of the "Trustee." The Trustee is a person or group of persons recognized as having exclusive authority and discretion over the management and control of plan assets; a subset of the overarching duty to control, manage and administer the plan. In other words, the responsibilities of the Trustee are specific and distinct from the responsibilities of the Named Fiduciary who has the duty to control, manage and administer the plan, although managing plan assets is also inherent in managing the plan. Therefore, it is not uncommon to see the Named Fiduciary also simultaneously serving as the Trustee.

Unlike the full scope powers of the Named Fiduciary, the Trustee possesses a specific scope of delegated responsibility. (People sometimes refer mistakenly to a custodian as the "Trustee," but in the context of ERISA, the Trustee is the person that has responsibility and discretion for managing trust assets.)

Where the Trustee is a separate person or persons from that of the Named Fiduciary, the Trustee is accountable to, and monitored by, the Named Fiduciary. A Trustee can be a "directed Trustee," meaning that it must take directions from a fiduciary with a higher level of authority. For example, the Named Fiduciary (i.e., the full scope/full service/full spectrum/full discretionary or whatever one wants to call the 3(21) fiduciary) could direct the Trustee to perform certain functions, or it could even replace the Trustee with another. Such a replacement may require changes to plan documentation, requiring plan sponsor involvement.

It is also possible for the full scope 3(21) fiduciary to appoint an ERISA section 3(38)-defined "Investment Manager" that will provide directions to the Trustee. In the absence of an ERISA section 3(38) fiduciary, the Trustee will generally retain its exclusive authority and discretion over plan assets until revoked by the Named Fiduciary. It is even possible for the Named Fiduciary to retain Trustee responsibilities, thereby serving as both Named Fiduciary and Trustee, which appears to be the fiduciary structure described in the white paper referenced previously.

4. The 3(38) Investment Manager

ERISA section 3(38) defines the "Investment Manager" as a fiduciary with full discretionary powers for selecting, monitoring and (if necessary) replacing the investment options (i.e., trust assets) in a qualified retirement plan. When appointed by an authorized fiduciary (e.g., the Named Fiduciary), the 3(38) takes an ascendant role over the Trustee. The Trustee then becomes "directed" by the ERISA section 3(38) Investment Manager. The 3(38) fiduciary is appointed, as noted, and monitored by the Named Fiduciary (or the full scope 3(21) fiduciary).

The 3(38) Investment Manager may hire and monitor other service providers relevant to its scope of responsibility. For example, the 3(38) will monitor fund managers (and replace them if prudent to do so), custodians and others. In such cases, it has the power and the duty to replace such service providers as it deems necessary and appropriate in its sole discretion.

The 3(38) fiduciary must also ensure that the objectives of the plan's portfolios are being met, with all the attendant responsibilities associated therewith.

5. The Investment Advisor

The investment advisor is not a term ERISA defines in the same manner as the aforementioned fiduciaries. An investment advisor to a qualified retirement plan usually does not have discretion over plan assets per se, but may exercise a certain level of influence and control over the operation of the plan. In other words, the investment advisor may not have explicit discretionary authority over the operation of a plan, but may exercise effective discretion through its influence upon others. That influence could be referred to as implicit discretion. At a minimum, the investment advisor must meet a fiduciary standard of care and, like all fiduciaries under ERISA, bears a duty of loyalty to the plan and plan participants which requires the advisor to:

a. Put the plan participants' best interests first;
b. Act with prudence; that is, with the skill, care, diligence and good judgment of a professional;
c. Not mislead plan sponsors or plan participants, but provide conspicuous, full and fair disclosure of all material facts;
d. Avoid conflicts of interest; and
e. Fully disclose and fairly manage, in the plan participants' favor, unavoidable conflicts.

The investment advisor to a plan is always a limited scope section 3(21) fiduciary except when it is appointed as an ERISA section 3(38) Investment Manager. For example, the investment advisor does not replace the Trustee, or act with unilateral discretion with respect to the trust assets in a plan portfolio. It does not have the authority to establish its own fees or the fees paid to other fiduciaries. The investment advisor can only propose fees that may (or may not) be approved by a higher authority that's described in the plan documents. Nor does it have responsibility to retain and pay legal counsel, auditors, consultants or other service providers on behalf of the plan generally. Those responsibilities normally are retained by the Named Fiduciary or Plan Administrator. If the investment advisor does not act in a 3(38) capacity, it will always be a limited scope 3(21).

The primary difference between a limited scope 3(21) investment advisor fiduciary and a 3(38) Investment Manager fiduciary is true explicit ERISA "discretion." Investment advisors give advice and recommendations freely to plan sponsors who may choose to accept or reject it. Since a limited scope investment advisor has no discretion within the context of ERISA, though, they bear little or no liability for the consequences of their advice. This truly limits the role and value of a 3(21) investment advisor to plan sponsors in the fiduciary context of ERISA. On the other hand, a 3(38) (or the Trustee in the absence of a 3(38)) possesses true authority to make decisions at their discretion and with prudent judgment.

The difference between an investment advisor and a 3(38) can be described as the difference between someone in the back seat (i.e., the investment advisor) of a car giving directions to the driver (i.e., the plan sponsor) and someone who has the keys and actually has the responsibility to drive the car (i.e., the 3(38) fiduciary). Big difference! In my experience, the plan sponsor and Named Fiduciary wants someone to drive the car and be accountable for getting the passengers to their destination safely and efficiently. It's easy to know that plan sponsors want an investment professional that is legally accountable to them and plan participants for fiduciary decisions that have real accountability. Just ask them.

6. Other Fiduciaries

Others fiduciaries include members of committees that could be appointed by the board of directors of the plan sponsor or the Named Fiduciary as well as others that may be acting in some fiduciary capacity under ERISA due to their actions. Although rare in practice, committee members may collectively serve as the Named Fiduciary and/or the Trustee. More commonly, however, committee members serve as a council, and report to the Named Fiduciary and Trustee on a regular basis. The investment advisor to a plan may participate as a member of a committee. The ERISA section 3(38) fiduciary may attend committee meetings, but a committee cannot dictate decisions to the 3(38).

A committee may be charged with monitoring other fiduciaries such as the investment advisor, the 3(38) fiduciary, the Trustee or even the Named Fiduciary. Monitoring a fiduciary with full discretionary authority, however, does not give the committee discretionary authority greater than that of the Named Fiduciary. Rather, monitoring is simply a prudent way to hold all fiduciaries accountable, regardless of the scope of their authority and discretion.

Conclusion

Expert professional independent fiduciaries understand how all of these fiduciary responsibilities work together on a day-to-day basis. After all, that is why plan sponsors retain them. Fiduciary experts do more than talk about the concepts of fiduciary responsibility; they live them each and every day in order to deliver their benefits to plan sponsors and plan participants. From many years of serving as an independent Named Fiduciary, I can attest that the best possible result for both sponsors and participants is to appoint a full scope ERISA section 3(21) fiduciary (i.e., the Named Fiduciary) which, in turn, appoints an ERISA section 3(38) fiduciary. This 3(21)/3(38) structure enables professional fiduciaries to take appropriate action when necessary and lower a plan's cost structure below that of the prevailing market. It also gives plan sponsors a professional third-party to be held accountable for the prudent management of a plan. Appointing a limited scope 3(21) investment advisor may, however, adequately serve the interests of plan sponsor and plan participants in some cases.

In all instances, the plan sponsor retains the authority to remove and replace any fiduciary, even if has delegated all day-to-day responsibilities to others.

The terms "full scope," or "full spectrum," or "full discretion" are often used interchangeably to explain the depth and breadth of fiduciary authority and discretion under ERISA. I have chosen to describe those fiduciaries with the authority and discretion to perform all functions in a plan, whether such functions are delegated to other fiduciaries or not, as "full scope 3(21) fiduciaries" but any of these other terms are perfectly acceptable as well.

The fiduciary profession is an honorable and rewarding one. The roles and responsibilities undertaken by every fiduciary are important and valuable. Yet their true value must be conveyed to plan sponsors accurately in order to (a) fulfill statutory requirements prudently and (b) avoid creating frustration and confusion that comes from scrambled fiduciary messages.

The following diagram may help communicate the proper fiduciary meanings and roles. (Click here to enlarge.)

How Altruisic is Wyclef's Haiti Aid Organization?

Carl Franzen

Carl FranzenContributor












Is Yéle Haiti, one of the highest-profile charities involved the Haitian earthquake relief effort, really as selfless its famous founder maintains? New documents obtained by the Smoking Gun suggest that prior to the quake, Wyclef Jean used money donated to his foundation to pay himself and his associates.

In the immediate aftermath of the disastrous earthquake that leveled his homeland, the Grammy Award-winning musician sprang into action: He charted a flight to Port-au-Prince, and flooded new and old media with requests for donations to his charity organization's quake aid fund. Other celebrities quickly followed suit and began promoting his cause.

As of Friday morning, reports estimated that Jean had raised upwards of $2 million simply from donations made via an automated cell phone text-messaging service. But exactly how much of that money and other lower-tech donations will actually go toward helping Haitians recover remains to be seen.

The paper trail uncovered and analyzed by the Smoking Gun includes tax returns for Yéle Haiti that were first filed in August 2009, despite the fact that the organization has been incorporated for 12 years.

Indeed, over that time, Yéle Haiti has also been sanctioned and had its corporate status dissolved on multiple occasions for failing to file disclosure reports.

The tax returns show that the organization made some $60,000 in rent and service payments to Platinum Sound, a recording studio in Manhattan owned by Jean and his cousin Jerry Duplessis. Jean also paid himself $250,000 for playing his own benefit concert, which the return claims is "substantially less than market value."

To date, Jean has not responded to the Smoking Gun's accusations that Haiti earthquake aid donations are being poured into a group that has allegedly dodged proper tax procedures and "enrich[ed]" the singer.

Stupid Death In Haiti

Rescued 11-Year-Old Haitian Girl Dies

Television audiences around the world watched as rescuers tried to free an 11-year-old Haitian girl from her collapsed home in Port-au-Prince on Thursday. But her story came to a tragic end shortly after they finally managed to remove her from the rubble.

The girl's family told CNN reporter Ivan Watson, who covered the rescue attempt for hours Thursday, that she died just one hour after rescuers cut an iron beam, freeing her right leg.



Rescuers heard the girl's cries inside the collapsed building and had dug through the debris to reach her, only to find that her leg was crushed beneath the weight of the structure. As they worked to free her, speculation mounted that her leg might have to be amputated.

Conscious and able to eat and drink, the girl often cried out in pain during her ordeal. At nightfall, rescuers used a saw to cut through an iron beam that was pinning her leg, and she was finally freed.

Her leg, however, was badly injured, and she required immediate medical attention. Witnesses told CNN she was transported to a first aid station that did not have the resources to deal with her wounds. She died before her family could take her to a better equipped facility outside the city.

Her uncle told CNN that the girl's last words were, "Mother, don't let me die."

Shark Tank Tycoon Reveals What It Takes


Shark Tank, my all-time favorite competitivereality show, starts a new cycle tonight on ABC, so you know what I'm doing every Friday night for the next five weeks. The premise, which uber-producer Mark Burnett based on Great Britain's Dragons' Den, has average Joes like you and me pitching our business ideas, in hopes of receiving seed money and expertise from a panel of five self-made million/billionaires.

The business, service and product pitches range from the sublime to the sub-par, and it's always fun to see which ones soar and which ones sink. Among some of the more memorable products have been a golf club with a hollow shaft in which an urgent golfer can relieve himself, underwear with a built-in charcoal odor filter and gluten-free play dough, in addition to more ordinary fare. You wouldn't believe which ones got funding (hint: two of the previously mentioned three).

One of the coolest and kindest of the Sharks, and certainly the best dressed, is Daymond John, the FUBU clothing magnate. He built his clothing line from one little tie-top hat into a multimillion dollar, international sensation, with his For Us, By Us label even being referenced by President Obama. He's heavily involved in charity work, and in mentoring and inspiring other entrepreneurs.

I had to ask him what it would take to be a successful entrepreneur in 2010, or if it's even possible. He quickly came up with the following ten tips:


1. Learn the business you want to be in, from the bottom up. Intern, go to school or work at a company that is in the same business.

2. If you have partners, be very clear on every person's role and duties in the company.

3. Legally and properly set up your company with trademarks, patents, and partnership contracts.

4. Have a clear mission statement and a time line, and review it annually.

5. Develop a master team of advisers whom you respect.

6. Test your product with strangers and people who have no vested interest, or don't want to hurt your feelings.

7. Be clear about what margins you must make to be successful.

8. Make sure you pay yourself and others who work for you. Many discount the labor factor, then when they finally make enough money to grow, they realize they left out this major line item.

9. Know what your competitor is doing, and the major challenges that are occurring in your business.

10. Network with others in your field.


Those contestants making pitches would do well to run down this list and make sure everything is covered. Sometimes the Sharks have passed on a really great idea merely because the originator forgot to get a patent, or didn't have a clue where their product's market was headed.

But then again, if you covered everything on this checklist, you might not need a Shark Tank investment--you could already be incredibly successful.